Discussion Castle siege registration

[Mr DJ]

My question is, Why does this certain Alliance gets special treatment week after week?

hello guys I'm here to voice a concern about castle siege . Because sometimes the correct registration is not followed. I admit that I forget but not often. but if every week you forget to follow the rules, maybe that's not the right thing to do. That's why we have rules of registration and then don't follow . These are just some shared concerns from brothers and sisters here. thank you

 

[Tensei]

Hi @Mr DJ,

I don't see any certain question in this thread that needs to be answered. Just edit your post if you forgot to include your question. No need to reply. But if none, I will move this thread to General MU Discussions.

Have a nice day!

 

[Miyeon]

My question is, Why does this certain Alliance gets special treatment week after week?

hello guys I'm here to voice a concern about castle siege . Because sometimes the correct registration is not followed. I admit that I forget but not often. but if every week you forget to follow the rules, maybe that's not the right thing to do. That's why we have rules of registration and then don't follow . These are just some shared concerns from brothers and sisters here. thank you

Hello @Mr DJ
I do understanf your concern, that we have rule about specific time for registration CS.
Rules must be followed, however, sometime guild master may forget to register their alliance for CS.
So, i suggest that, we limit each alliance can do "late registration" 1 time each month.

 

[RESiSTANT]

My question is, Why does this certain Alliance gets special treatment week after week?

hello guys I'm here to voice a concern about castle siege . Because sometimes the correct registration is not followed. I admit that I forget but not often. but if every week you forget to follow the rules, maybe that's not the right thing to do. That's why we have rules of registration and then don't follow . These are just some shared concerns from brothers and sisters here. thank you

We can do this for everyone, not just 1 specific alliance. Don't get this wrong. More players = more fun. If they don't have chance to registered in time then we can help with manual registration.

 

[Sava]

Hi, dear infinitians!

Some of you have already shared your concerns about this with me on discord.

It's true that there is clear infos about castle siege schedule here https://forum.infinitymu.net/threads/castle-siege-schedule.8580/ and here https://www.infinitymu.net/info/castle-siege.

and your concerns, there is an alliance that has been missing the registration time very often lately, but still you see the alliance later on the list.

it's absolutely understandable.


When u guys already pmed me about it, I discussed it with @RESiSTANT . I believe you guys trust me and Venci. We do not have any concealed thoughts or bad intention towards anyone.

Recently, the number of registered guilds in the castle siege is very low.

So, please don't get us wrong. All we want is to see at least the max number of registered guilds, more fun and action in the Castle Siege event. We can do it for any alliance.

I hope you understand our point of view.

Have a great day everyone.

Sincerely,
Sava.

 

[SuperStell]

Unfortunately I would like to share my dissatisfaction with all the abuses of this guild but at this point there's nothing to be done because the CS is fun with people and more guilds means more fun.
I think at this matter I'd do the same as the Administration did and is doing, which is try hard to bring us players more fun while playing and in exchange I think we should make new guilds and alliances in order to attack in CS to make the cs event even more fun.
I'm sure if there are many guilds registrated the administration wouldn't reg any1 manually but there are max 1/2 guilds registred per week and thats the reason they granting every ally leader request to reg manual.
Think about it everyone, I would like to see much more guilds registred to cs to make this event a big dispute as it should be.