Castle-Siege

[SuperStell]

Hello everyone,

I would like to make 2 suggestions for CS.

Suggestion 1) Make the CS event only 1 hour -> im someone who really like enjoying 2 hours cs event but nowadays not much players interested on this event what makes the first hour really boring, so for the meantime i suggest to make the CS only 1 hour.

Suggestion 2) Change the rules again and force sealers to seal when they handle both sw, this way CS will be more exceting and sealers wont wait to seal on last mins.

If after grant 1 hour CS many players return to the game then you guys can think in make it 2 hours again but for now with the numbers of player playing this event maybe 1 hour will make the fight more intense to the start till the end.

 

[MarveI]

Hello everyone It's a great idea. I think it would be better if it were like this.

 

[Hawkeye]

the idea is excellent
Since it lasts an hour, it increases the competitiveness among participants.

I would add as a suggestion:
check for fake clans or not when competing in the event. ... (I think they did this a few years ago)

 

[Tobλ]

Hello everyone,

I would like to make 2 suggestions for CS.

Suggestion 1) Make the CS event only 1 hour -> im someone who really like enjoying 2 hours cs event but nowadays not much players interested on this event what makes the first hour really boring, so for the meantime i suggest to make the CS only 1 hour.

Suggestion 2) Change the rules again and force sealers to seal when they handle both sw, this way CS will be more exceting and sealers wont wait to seal on last mins.

If after grant 1 hour CS many players return to the game then you guys can think in make it 2 hours again but for now with the numbers of player playing this event maybe 1 hour will make the fight more intense to the start till the end.

Forcing and laughing at the other ally to seal right away since you always give free seals is okay, and that ally must obey your commands. But other allies' strategies, such as using MG or refusing your free seal, are not okay? Make it make sense, mi #2 hater. The point is always being fair. Why that one ally has to succumb to you just because you don't want to defend.

 

[SuperStell]

Forcing and laughing at the other ally to seal right away since you always give free seals is okay, and that ally must obey your commands. But other allies' strategies, such as using MG or refusing your free seal, are not okay? Make it make sense, mi #2 hater. The point is always being fair. Why that one ally has to succumb to you just because you don't want to defend.

I think suggestions should be welcome and if they are not good they can be easily rejected, there is no need to change subject or try to make it personal.

 

[Tobλ]

I think suggestions should be welcome and if they are not good they can be easily rejected, there is no need to change subject or try to make it personal.

That is not personal what I mentioned above. It is my concern about you / others forcing other allies into sealing right away, and you not even trying to defend is a known fact. A valid question is why the other alliance should succumb to your orders and accept that free seal? What if they don't want that? What if they want to fight for that seal legitimately and you rob them of that during the CS because you don't want to defend, making it boring for some players? Why should you be the only one to have that right to decide and not also them? I want you to answer these questions, @SuperStell. We are discussing your suggestion, and such discussions must take place.

 

[SuperStell]

That is not personal what I mentioned above. It is my concern about you / others forcing other allies into sealing right away, and you not even trying to defend is a known fact. A valid question is why the other alliance should succumb to your orders and accept that free seal? What if they don't want that? What if they want to fight for that seal legitimately and you rob them of that during the CS because you don't want to defend, making it boring for some players? Why should you be the only one to have that right to decide and not also them? I want you to answer these questions, @SuperStell. We are discussing your suggestion, and such discussions must take place.

I didn't know that I was so powerful

I dont want players to play how i want them to play but as they feel better playing, its just suggestion to find a solution since not much players playing CS and it's been boring because of that.
CS event is much more fun when its full of players but since we have only few players playing this then we need to find way to make more players exceting, like creating more competitive scenario.
No need to take my suggestion as the truth but let other players to speak up them ideas and find a way to make this event much more enjoyable as it was in close past.

 

[Halfdanjal]

I agree about 1 hour, 2 is way too much. It will be far easier for people to free 1 hour up rather than 2, plus it will indeed be more competitive.

Not sealing is a tactic, giving seal away is tactic, I don't see how enforcing this improves anything.

 

[RESiSTANT]

Your suggestion has been granted! Starting August 30, 2025, the Castle Siege event kicks off at the usual time but will now be packed into an intense one-hour battle!

Get ready, join early,