What's new

Castle Siege Discussion 02/05/2026 (FactioN)

Status
Not open for further replies.
I’ll add my thoughts and 2 coins to the above, but just in general, since I assume a lot of people agree with this.

You don’t really think all decisions will be made publicly, do you? Maybe discussions about the reports will be public too? :laughing-hard:
As far as I’m concerned, this makes sense. As the alliance leader, he bears the responsibility.
Let him explain himself to his people.

If KOKAK had won this CS and everything had been okay, there probably wouldn’t have been any discussion.
 
Congrats
Post automatically merged:

It's just sad for the AYASIB members and allies who fought until the last minute to defend the crown. Hoping for considerations or compensation for them.
 
Last edited:
Congratulations guys
 
  1. I would like to request clarification regarding this matter. Is it stated in the rules that if a sealer uses a proxy server, the seal is automatically considered void? Our understanding has always been that a seal becomes void only when the player fails to submit a seal video. As far as I know, Ayasib’s sealer did submit a video.Additionally, during the previous Castle Siege, he was also using the Singapore server, yet no action was taken at that time because your team was able to secure the seal. However, now that the seal was not taken, a ban was issued. May I kindly ask for an explanation regarding this inconsistency?
 
Congratulations mates 👏 👏
 
Martheena said:
Congratulations faction and allies!

But, im so confused. There's no admin discussion/thread about the decision on the last CS. But you guys already made a thread. Also, after the successful seal, admin checked Collapse' ip address right away. Are they finding a reason to make faction won the CS? Its also unfair for the members of ayasib who successfully defend the crown. They put a lot of effort. Most of them (or probably all of them) didnt know that Collapse used singapore server. So its unfair to them. Also, what if we (KOKAK And allies) won that CS? It will be invalidated too because of collapse action?

I think the best way is to invalidate that event. No winners on that date but faction still has the 9 win streak and can continue their legacy on the upcoming events.


It just my concern. I hope everyone will understand. Dont hate me for stating my opinion.

Hope everyone is having a good day! Spread the love not hate.
Click to expand...
The name you just gave away is banned in forum, maybe should be even censored.

That being said: the effort of the AYASIB ally was in vain because of their leader: if the leader chooses to disobey the rules, than he must bear the consequences for all the team. Using VPN connections throughout servers that are not permitted is restricted, because it may create an advantage.
As Luxie said: reports section are not for the public, nor the staff team discussion.

If KOKAK would've won, there wouldn't be any problem and we would've another winner on the last CS event.
But from my point of view, AYASIB succesfully sealing while using forbidden server, led to the FactioN ally loosing the crown, who were the defenders.
Maybe if they sealed while KOKAK ally being the defender, we would've had a different outcome.

We appreciate any opinion, that's what forum is about, so do not worry, there won't be hating around :)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom